When climate leaders and negotiators gathered in Belém for COP30, far from Delhi’s budget corridors, the question hanging in the air was not only about carbon curves or finance numbers. It was simpler and harder: would global climate action finally recognise that climate change is already being lived – in parched fields, overheated homes, flood-hit hamlets, and unpaid care work carried largely by rural women?
For organisations like Transform Rural India (TRI), participating in COP30 dialogues across the Agri Zone, South–South platforms, and hosting Agro-ecology or contributing to Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) roundtables, one message stood out clearly. Climate action will succeed or fail not in global plenaries, but in Gram Panchayats—through local institutions, women’s collectives, and panchayats that are already managing land, water, energy, food, biodiversity, perceptual, and visual-sensory aspects, care under intensifying climate stress.
Seen through this lens, India’s Union Budget 2026–27 is not just a fiscal statement. It is a test of whether national policy is ready to operationalise a Gram Panchayat-first climate transition.
What COP30 got right—and what it missed
COP30 did not deliver a dramatic breakthrough. But it did trigger a political shift that matters for India. Adaptation—long treated as secondary to mitigation—moved to the centre, with a commitment to significantly scale global adaptation finance and adopt global indicators to track progress.
For rural India, this recognition is critical. It legitimises investments in water security, climate-resilient agriculture, health systems, and livelihood diversification as climate action rather than welfare. Discussions around Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement also at the very least opened space for smallholders, women’s collectives, and community institutions to participate in carbon markets linked to restoration, agroforestry, and clean energy.
Yet the misses were equally stark. There was no clear roadmap for fossil fuel phase-out, leaving rural communities exposed to volatile input costs and climate extremes they did not cause. Adaptation finance commitments lacked delivery mechanisms—raising the familiar question of how funds actually reach a panchayat or a women’s group. Carbon markets remain technically complex, not compliant, and voluntary, and risk recentralising control unless strong safeguards and community ownership are built in. And global metrics still struggle to capture women’s unpaid labour, heat stress, migration, and debt cycles.
COP30, in short, offered a framework—not justice by default.
From budget lines to climate outcomes: A village-first green economy
India’s Union Budget 2026–27 offers a set of concrete levers for building climate resilience from the ground up—particularly through Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and women-led institutions. This opportunity is especially significant amid withdrawals by the United States from key climate pacts, which heighten the urgency for India to rely less on uncertain global flows and more on domestic systems of adaptation, ownership, and delivery.
The Budget’s rural infrastructure, livelihoods, and energy allocations can operationalise the core COP30 insight articulated by Transform Rural India (TRI): climate action must be designed from the village upward, with local institutions controlling planning, finance, and outcomes. The question is no longer intent, but execution.
Panchayat-led planning and access to climate finance
COP30 discussions consistently highlighted that adaptation finance fails when it bypasses local governments. India can address this gap directly by empowering Gram Panchayats as climate planning units. A first step is to create dedicated adaptation windows under MGNREGA and PMKSY, explicitly linked to climate risk assessments embedded in Gram Panchayat Development Plans (GPDPs). This aligns with COP30’s call to move from project-based adaptation to systems-level planning. The Budget allocates approximately ₹2.5 lakh crore for rural infrastructure. Earmarking even 10–15% of this outlay for Panchayat-managed climate assets—such as farm ponds, drip irrigation systems, watershed works, and resilient seed systems—would create a predictable, locally controlled adaptation pipeline at scale. Equally critical is simplifying fund flows. Integrating PFMS with Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) can enable direct Panchayat access to funds, reducing delays and intermediaries that currently dilute outcomes. To connect villages and Gram Panchayats to emerging global climate finance, the Budget could pilot “Climate Hubs” across 5,000 high-vulnerability blocks, training local youth in climate risk mapping, monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV), and carbon accounting under Article 6.4. This would allow districts like Bastar to participate directly in carbon markets rather than remaining peripheral beneficiaries.
Scaling women-led institutions as climate anchors
India already possesses a climate-ready institutional backbone: 1.5 crore women organised into SHGs under NRLM. COP30 reinforced that women’s institutions are not auxiliary to climate action—they are central to it. The Budget’s livelihoods push can be sharpened by prioritising SHG federations within initiatives such as Bharat-VISTAAR, particularly in high-value, climate-aligned, green economy sectors, including agroforestry, biodigesters, solar irrigation, and bio-inputs. A targeted intervention would be a ₹10,000 crore concessional credit line, routed through SHG federations and backed by first-loss default guarantees, to finance biogas units linked to CNG blending, solar irrigation FLDGs, women-owned bio-input and agroforestry enterprises. Carbon-linked revenue streams can strengthen these models. For instance, monetising six Gold Standard credits per biodigester can fully finance clean energy assets while generating surplus revenue. Explicitly directing these proceeds toward women’s asset ownership and GBV-safe community centres ensures that climate finance translates into social resilience. Governance reforms must accompany finance. Mandating 50% women’s representation in PRIs not just climate budgeting, but actually “budgeting climate”, and training 50 lakh SHG leaders, would institutionalise intersectional planning that accounts for gender, caste, landholding, and livelihood vulnerability. Open dashboards tracking soil carbon, income stability, and adaptation outcomes would make local climate performance visible and accountable.
Converging infrastructure, livelihoods, and ecology
The Budget’s regional development thrust—particularly initiatives such as Purvodaya—offers a pathway to demonstrate Panchayat-led climate convergence in high-vulnerability states like Chhattisgarh. Targeted investments could support 1 lakh village-level biodigesters, 5 million hectares of agroecology pilots, and SHG-led green value chains linked to enterprises, to assured markets. To crowd in private capital without compromising community control, the Budget could introduce Rural Resilience Bonds, issued through municipal bodies or PRIs, with safeguards for free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) and transparent benefit-sharing. Finally, resilience requires institutional capacity. Establishing 10,000 block-level climate extension hubs, staffed by trained SHG women, would strengthen responses to heat stress, vector-borne diseases, and fertiliser transitions—while aligning with PM-PRANAM incentives for reduced chemical input use.
From signals to systems change
COP30 made one reality unmistakable: global climate ambition will not automatically translate into local resilience. With geopolitical uncertainty constraining international cooperation, India’s domestic systems must do more of the heavy lifting. The Union Budget 2026–27 contains the fiscal building blocks to make this shift. By routing climate finance, energy transitions, and livelihood investments through Panchayats and women-led institutions—and by retaining local ownership over planning and outcomes—India can convert budgetary intent into durable, equitable climate resilience.
Designing from the Gram Panchayat upward is no longer a normative aspiration. It is a fiscal, institutional, and political necessity.
Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author’s own.
END OF ARTICLE
